Broadcast
Editor's Association(BEA) has issued a statement taking objection to Narendra
Modi's speech today in Delhi in which he questioned the conduct of a particular
journalist (read Barkha Dutta). This is just another of the many instances
where the Indian mainstream media closes ranks and shields powerful media
personalities even at the very hint of some external scrutiny.
The controversy has its roots in a
comment by a well-known Pakistani journalist Hamid Mir on Geo TV. Mir described
and quoted - Sharif smilingly told
Barkha “it seems Manmohan Singh went to complain to Obama about me not like
India’s Prime Minister but like a ‘dehati aurat’, during a breakfast meeting
with him and NDTV’s Barkha Dutt on Saturday while expressing his unhappiness
that Singh complained to the US President Barack Obama about Sharif on
Pakistan. Geo TV is on record, has telecasted live the statement of Mir where
he was clearly heard saying the above. After the controversy erupted, Mir later
tweeted: "PM Nawaz never said anything derogatory against Manmohan."
But didn’t say that Sharif never used that phrase. This shows that for Mir such
a statement about Indian PM is not derogatory.
Now let’s examine what Brakha Dutta
has to say about this incident. Barkha tweeted that "Sharif's allegorical
account was all about how disputes should not involve third parties. Not once
was a slur passed by him against the PM. Sharif was upset that Pakistan (was)
raised by India with Obama. In this context, he told an allegorical tale. In
Sharif's tale, there was a dispute between two villagers, one of whom was a
woman. Story ended with how fights should be settled between parties". But
here she actually revealed more than she could hide. She accepted that Sharif
actually narrated about a fight and
mentioned about a village women. What she avoided to clarify was who Sharif
compared with the village women (dehati aurat).
BEA is upset because Modi during his speech said "the journalists
who were sitting in front of Nawaz Sharif when he was insulting our Prime
Minister should also answer to the people of my country. I want to ask those
journalists, I don't know who were they but journalists of my country who were
having sweets sitting with Nawaz Sharif when he was abusing our Prime Minister
calling him village woman, I expected those Indian journalists, the country
expected them, to refuse the sweets and walk out”. Can BEA explain what wrong
Modi said about Indian Journalists? Our so called secular media could not
digest "puppy" or "burqa" analogy, but they are quite
comfortable with "dehati aurat" analogy made by the Pakistani PM
about their own PM. If Nawaz Sharif narrates an anecdote which is malicious, they
describe it as "wildly misconstrued, misinterpreted, and misreported"
(Times Of India report). But if Modi
tells an anecdote, then that is construed as ill and derogatory. What kind of ethical
and nationalistic journalism is it? BEA is quick enough to issue statement
objecting to Modi’s speech but can they explain to citizens of India – what action
did they take when a section of media created controversy by publishing imaginary
news that a mall in Gujarat on the idd day refused entry to muslim youth, which
later proved to be completely false?? Can they also explain, what action did
they take against those journalists, who published a fake report that Modi
claimed to have rescued 15,000 people
during Uttarakhand flood and gave him the name “Rambo”? Can they also explain
what action they took against Barkha Dutta, who was caught on tape brokering
deals among political parties during the “Radiagate”. Therefore, BEA has no credibility to question
Narendra Modi on anything.
Narendra Modi is perfectly right in criticizing Sharif and the
Indian journalist for making and tolerating a joke about our Prime Minister. BEA’s
defence of the Indian journalist means that they don’t understand the stature
of the Prime Minister and have no sense of dignity & patriotism. A sincere
and mature leader of a country never indulges in such joke about leader of
another country, when they are headed for a serious talk. There are protocols
to be followed when two Prime Ministers engage in talks with each other, which have long term implications for both the
countries. Modi with his sense of patriotism could never tolerate
such an act. It seems that BEA and some of the paid secular media don’t
even feel the sense of being an Indian - a proud nationalist Indian. Defending such
an act is more heinous than the insult.
If Sharif dares to insults our PM,
we should be able to hit back firmly saying that his country behaves
like a prostitute and is enjoying paid sex with USA. It is a fact that Pakistan
can do anything for aid money and material from USA. USA has already
impregnated Pakistan and she has delivered an illegitimate child to this world called
“Islamic Terrorism”.