Thursday, 17 April 2014

The Secular Cap on Unsecular Skulls…

The “Secular Saints” of Congress party and the Media are again trying to start another controversy about the most loved whipping boy of Indian Politics Narendra Modi by racking up his statement that he is against any symbol of appeasement which includes Muslim skull cap. What these “Secular Saints”  fail to explain is - does wearing a religious symbol of only one particular community make Indian politicians specially hindu politicians secular?


Why in India only hindus have to bear the burden of secularism and prove their secular credentials all the time? Why is it that the “Secular Saints” of media and politics, don’t dare to ask muslims to practice the “secular dharma” in their personal and public life, the way they ask Hindus to practice the same? We never see any Muslim leaders participating in any Hindu religious ceremony let alone wearing a Tilak or accepting Prasad. Have anybody ever seen any Muslim leader participating in Holi, Diwali or Ganesh Chaturthi Utsav wearing a Saffron Anga Vastra or Turban? But no they need not do so, as Muslims are born secular but they demand that others behave as per their whims and fancies. How does it matter if Imam Bukhari asks Muslims not to join Anna Hazare because of Vande Matram, how does it matter that Saudi King while visiting India does not go to Mahatma Gandhi's samadhi, how does it matter if Islam forbids its faithful’s not to offer respect to Hindu culture or deities? It doesn’t matter to this brigade that BSP MP Shafiqur  Rahman  Barq, walked out of the Lok Sabha as India's national song Vande Mataram began playing, saying that it amounts to worshipping the Motherland & it is incorrect for a true muslim as he can worship only Allah. It also does not matter to them that Kerala ministers of Indian Union Muslim league IUML (allies of  "secular Congress party ” ruling Kerala), are refusing to light a lamp to inaugurate public functions saying this Indian tradition is un-Islamic.


Just imagine how Modi would appear in the “Breaking News” and next day's News Papers if he had indeed worn the skull cap. The very media that is questioning his secular credentials today would have written head lines as “Maulana Modi”  and that he is playing communal politics and  ready to stoop to any level to become PM.  Modi is a man who’s secularism is in his heart and deeds to his motherland.  Anyone else in his place would have succumbed to the flashing cameras and simply worn the cap. They choose to ignore his dedicated work to improve the economy of Gujarat, but are outraged that he declined to wear a skull cap.


The result of our undefined "secular" culture has become a tool for appeasement of a particular minority community. For Congress & it’s allies like SP, BSP, JD(U), RJD, NCP, DMK, TMC etc. & the LEFT FRONT- Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists etc. are not part of minority community as they don’t vote in block. The whole Indian constitution & even Supreme Court judgments have no value infront of dictates from the Mullahs. Who can forget the Shah Bano case – which was the greatest example of travesty of natural justice in a modern secular democracy? How can a secular country spent tax payers money only for religious pilgrimage of one particular community?? Haj houses have been built in every corner of the country, subsidy on airfare is given, every send off & return is attended by a political leader in every airport of the country. But not even a proper road & shelter on the way in JK for Amarnath pilgrims as it will endanger environment. Last year JK Govt. (coalition of NC & Congress) has even withdrawn the little state support given on food & diesel etc. to Amarnath pilgrimage on their way. But none of these “Secular Saints” raised a hue & cry. Think of the same, had it been done for Haj. Dussehra, Hanuman Jayanti & Ganesh Chaturthi processions can’t cross muslim majority areas, as muslims will complain about breaking peace in their area by loud noise & gatherings. But Hindus will have to hear the prayers from mosque 5 times a day on loudspeakers (strangely even Indonesia, the country with the largest muslim population doesn’t allow prayer on loudspeakers) because India is a secular country. Riots will occur in Azad Maidan in Mumbai if illegal migrants get killed due to their fight for encroachment on tribal land in Assam or bomb blasts are justified in Bodhgaya as muslims are killed in Myanmar violence. But if a hindu is killed or converted live on TV in Pakistan/Bangladesh, no hindu should even utter a word , since hindus are secular & this is Pakistan's internal matter. Crores of Bangladeshi muslims are allowed to settle in all states of India, but India Govt. has no time to think of Kashmiri Pandits, who have been systematically thrown out of their ancestral land of thousands of years. Congress joins hand with Muslim league, MQM, AIUDF etc. to win election after election, gave article 370, massacred thousands of Sikhs in Delhi in 1984, nurtured Masood Madani of Kerela, Owaisi brothers of AP, Abu Azmi in Mumbai, Geelanis in JK, but still Congress is most Secular & as BJP talks about removal of article 370, uniform civil code for all citizens etc., so BJP is most Communal. RJD supremo, Laloo Yadav's only claim to fame apart from the fodder scam and the lawlessness he gifted to Bihar, remains that of a die-hard secularist who got LK Advani arrested. Nitish Kumar, rediscovers his secular credentials by separating from BJP only after getting a shockingly lukewarm response to his state-wide Sewa Yatra and sensing that his bete noire Laloo Yadav had recovered some of his lost ground. Union Home Minister Shinde has given another example of secular governance by issuing a dictate to the police of the country not to arrest “muslim people” unnecessarily for investigating terror cases. Mulayam Singh Yadav has instructed UP Police Chiefs to deploy atleast 3 muslim policeman in every police station in UP. And too top it all the supreme leader of Congress party, Sonia Gandhi refers to muslim voters as the only secular voters of the country and ask for support service of Shahi Imam to get muslim votes in block for Congress. A leader like Narendra Modi, who says for him “Secularism means India First”, who says “Justice for all & appeasement of none”, who says “Religion should not be used as an instrument in our democratic process” is a “Communal” Politician but Digvijaya Singhs, Manish Tiwaris, Mulayams - who use every available opportunity to appease muslims even at the cost of national security like, Samjhauta Express Blast, 26/11 Mumbai blast, Batala House encounter, Afzal Guru case, Ishrat Jahan case & even demoralizes our armed forces & intelligence agencies are “Secular Saints”.


Does the “Secular Saints” know the meaning of secularism? It is separation of religion  from state.  A secular person or politician can continue to hold his personal religious faith & beliefs, but he doesn't involve religion in matters of governance.  They need to remember that India is a secular country, only because it’s 80% population is hindu. Nobody also should try to hide that fact that as long as muslims are in minority in a country, they want secularism to prevail but the moment they become majority, they want a theocratic, shariah practicing Islamic country. Can they show a muslim majority country, which is secular? India had Muslim as President, PM, Chief justice and in many other important posts, only because it’a  hindu majority country. Can they show a muslim majority country where a non muslim could ever become a president, a prime minister or a chief justice or even reach one of the highest ranks in armed forces? Why a country, can a non muslim ever become CM in the only muslim majority state in India i.e. Jammu & Kashmir? But the “Secular Saints” will never raise those questions but ask only hindus of this country to practice secularism. Hindu is the only religion who preaches and practices secularism in the true sense and no hindu can be communal unless pushed to the wall as communalism is not in the DNA of Hindus. History proves this fact and therefore, being the largest religion at one time (few centuries ago), it’s survival is at stake today for practicing secularism. The Mullah’s who preach hatred towards other religious faith and belief every Friday and openly encourage people for “Jihad” (hoy war) against “Kefers”(non believers) are all secular, the missioneries who’s only aim in the guise of spreading education & health is religious conversion are all seculars, but if some hindus try to protest or stop them in such activity, they are communal. For these “Secular Saints”- deriding hindu culture, faith and Gods through literature, art etc. are secular freedom of expression but if someone presents facts against muslims, then that’s communal.


Sorry “Secular Saints”, your dangerous & notorious game plan has been exposed & will not work with the electorate this time. My vote will not be for a leader or a party who wears religion on the head.

Wednesday, 9 April 2014

ऐ मेरे वतन के सेकुलरों, जरा आँख में भर लो शर्म: ... जो शहीद हुए उनकी क़ुरबानी का नहीं था कोई धर्म

Samajwadi Party leader and UP minister Azam Khan has created another controversy by saying that India won the Kargil War solely because of Muslim soldiers and no Hindu soldier was behind the victory. Addressing a rally in Ghaziabad(UP) on last Monday afternoon, Khan while asking “Hindu brothers” to embrace Muslims, said,”…isliye mohabbat karo ki Kargil ki pahadiyo ko fateh karne wala koi Hindu nahi tha, balki Kargil ki pahadiyo ko nara-e-takbeer Allah-Hu-Akbar kehkar fathe karnewale Musalman fauji the… (love us because peaks of Kargil were not conquered by Hindus, but by Muslim soldiers raising the battle cry of God is the Greatest).”

We all should believe that the defence personals of the nation should not be divided or counted by their religion. Former Army Chief General VK Singh rightly said that it wasn’t any particular community but “Indians” who won the battle for India. While all nationalistic and patriotic Indians should follow the above but it’s also necessary to give a strong reply to anti-social and religious fanatics like Azam Khan and people like him alongwith   their supporters and sympathisers by taking appropriate actions to teach them a lesson. Else they will be encouraged to continue such anti national activities. Also, they need to be exposed with facts and figures that what they are saying is just to mislead Muslims in India to believe lies similar to what Pakistan teaches to its school students about victories against India in the wars including Kargil. It is well documented that India lost 527 nos. of soldiers during Kargil war and only 11 of them were Muslims.

For making such outrageous comments, Azam Khan would have been behind bars in a true secular democracy  like USA or UK or French for treason against the Nation Or would have been shot dead in Saudi Arab or Iran or even Pakistan for hurting national sentiment. But as India is a pseudo secular democracy, we have to tolerate such anti national, jihadi, religious fanatic traitors like Azam Khan and our so called secular media, politicians and intellectuals are not crying hoarse. This culture of appeasement and undue tolerance of a particular minority community needs to change in this country. Our politicians, law makers and majority of nationalistic and patriotic citizens need to show spine and our criminal panel code needs to be strengthened. Such traitors should be immediately either shot dead or sent behind the bar for treason against the nation and national army and this nation needs to show to all citizens that such utterances would not be tolerated here. Such inhuman can’t even ask for human rights and we need not offer any mercy to such morons. His track record clearly suggests that he is an ISI and Pakistani agent who is trying everything to harm our nation from inside at every opportunity. He is still leaving in Aurangjeb’s era with Mughalian superiority complex and taking advantage of our nation’s democracy, democratic institutions and so called secular tolerance. These comments are another old Islamic fantasy they like to tell themselves to feel good about themselves- that Muslims are better soldiers than Hindus. What Pakistani soldiers heard when they died in Kargil was "Hah Har Mahadev, Jai Maha Kali, Ayo Gorkhali". He needs to be told that Captain Vikram Batra  was not a Muslim. Neither Saurav Kalia, the prisoner of war- whose eyes were gauged, private parts were chopped and mutilated body was handed over to India by the Pakistani savages, because he did not disclose to Pakistan anything about Indian Army deployment was a Muslim.  Since when did Gorkhas, Sikhs and Jats become "Muslims"? Even in mixed units like the grenadiers that fought on Tiger Hills, Yogendra Singh Yadav from 18th grenadiers earned the Param Vir Chakra. Azam Khan should be made to realize that the religion of nationalism and Indian Armed forces is not UP political arena and beyond the realm of parasites like Azam Khan, who are living in India but are loyal to their religious masters in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Kargil war was thrust upon India because  of a Muslim Pakistan and it’s 100% muslim armed forces. There is no country who has fought more wars against another country in modern times than India against Pakistan.  

Azam Khan is more dangerous than Afzal Gurus and Kasabs. This country has not forgotten what this same Azam Khan said when SIMI was banned for the first time that “the move smacks of political vendetta against the Muslims of the country”. As per him SIMI is a socio-religious organization of Muslim youth and involved in character-building of the youth and other social work.  But it is on records that SIMI, originally was formed as the student wing of the Jamaat-e-Islami Hind (JIH) in an effort to revitalize the Students Islamic Organization (SIO) established in 1956. It is an Islamist fundamentalist organization, which advocates the ‘liberation of India’ by converting it to an Islamic land. The SIMI, an organisation of young extremist students has declared Jihad against India, the aim of which is to establish Dar-ul-Islam (land of Islam) by either forcefully converting everyone to Islam or by violence. SIMI’s slogan is "Allah is our Lord, the Qur’an is our constitution, Muhammad is our leader, jihad is our way & shahada is our desire". SIMI maintains that concepts of secularism, democracy & nationalism - keystones of Indian Constitution, are antithetical to Islam. They aim to restore the supremacy of Islam through the resurrection of the khilafat, emphasis on the Muslim ummah & the waging of jihad.  He is also on record saying that he doubts whether Kashmir is a part of India. Terrorism is flourishing in India unhindered courtesy politicians like Azam Khan, who are sponsored by ISI and other anti India organizations and countries.   This nation should have the guts to put on summery trial such traitors like Azam Khan, who has brought disregard to the noble sacrifices of Indian Army. He is unfit to be an Indian citizen let alone in politics in this country. Anti-national politicians like Azam Khan are today the biggest threat to our nation and should face prosecution for falsification & wilful suppression of facts.

It's strange how 66 years after Independence the debate on secularism dwarfs the real issues a progressive nation should be debating.  And therefore, we see a total silence from most of the political parties, pseudo secular media and  the so called secular intellectuals, who normally jumps into almost everything said by the BJP, RSS etc. The only reason behind such silence of  the political parties like Congress, SP, BSP, JD(U), RJD, TMC, NCP, Left front etc. is because they can’t risk alienating the Muslim vote-bank  during the election time and even otherwise too. Congress party and its supreme leader Sonia Gandhi anyway thinks that only the Muslims are secular. But it’s strange that even the media, intellectuals and other social activists, who are self-proclaimed protector of secularism from communal forces (read BJP) are also silent. Does being a minority leader give Azam Khan the right to say anything even at the cost of national integrity and security? Why such privileges are accorded only to the minority leaders from a particular community in this country, while if a Hindu leader talks of the Hindu’s rights, he is seen as communal and committing a sin?

Hopefully the coming elections will settle this debate once and for all. Otherwise it would not be long before we become slaves again.  Azam Khan, Akbaruddin Owaisi, Shakeel Ahmed etc.’s recent utterances should serve as wake up call for all of us to respond appropriately.  It’s high time, that we follow, the preaching of Kathopanishad, popularised by Swami Vivekanand, “Arise, Awake & stop not, till the goal is achieved”, the goal being liberating our country, from the clutches of these Pseudo Secular Politicians, Media and Intellectuals.