The “Secular Saints” of Congress
party and the Media are again trying to start another controversy about the most loved
whipping boy of Indian Politics Narendra Modi by racking up his statement that
he is against any symbol of appeasement which includes Muslim skull cap. What these
“Secular Saints” fail to explain is -
does wearing a religious symbol of only one particular community make Indian
politicians specially hindu politicians secular?
Why in India only hindus have to bear
the burden of secularism and prove their secular credentials all the time? Why
is it that the “Secular Saints” of media and politics, don’t dare to ask
muslims to practice the “secular dharma” in their personal and public life, the
way they ask Hindus to practice the same? We never see any Muslim leaders
participating in any Hindu religious ceremony let alone wearing a Tilak or
accepting Prasad. Have anybody ever seen any Muslim leader participating in
Holi, Diwali or Ganesh Chaturthi Utsav wearing a Saffron Anga Vastra or Turban?
But no they need not do so, as Muslims are born secular but they demand that
others behave as per their whims and fancies. How does it matter if Imam
Bukhari asks Muslims not to join Anna Hazare because of Vande Matram, how does
it matter that Saudi King while visiting India does not go to Mahatma Gandhi's
samadhi, how does it matter if Islam forbids its faithful’s not to offer
respect to Hindu culture or deities? It doesn’t matter to this brigade that BSP MP Shafiqur Rahman Barq,
walked out of the Lok Sabha as India's national song Vande Mataram began
playing, saying that it amounts to worshipping the Motherland & it is
incorrect for a true muslim as he can worship only Allah. It also does not matter
to them that Kerala ministers of Indian Union Muslim league IUML (allies of "secular Congress party ” ruling Kerala),
are
refusing to light a lamp to inaugurate public functions saying this Indian
tradition is un-Islamic.
Just imagine how Modi would appear in
the “Breaking News” and next day's News Papers if he had indeed worn the skull
cap. The very media that is questioning his secular credentials today would
have written head lines as “Maulana Modi”
and that he is playing communal politics and ready to stoop to any level to become
PM. Modi is a man who’s secularism is in
his heart and deeds to his motherland.
Anyone else in his place would have succumbed to the flashing cameras
and simply worn the cap. They choose to ignore his dedicated work to improve
the economy of Gujarat, but are outraged that he declined to wear a skull cap.
The result of our undefined
"secular" culture has become a tool for appeasement of a particular
minority community. For Congress & it’s allies like SP, BSP, JD(U), RJD,
NCP, DMK, TMC etc. & the LEFT FRONT- Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists etc. are not
part of minority community as they don’t vote in block. The whole Indian
constitution & even Supreme Court judgments have no value infront of
dictates from the Mullahs. Who can forget the Shah Bano case – which was the
greatest example of travesty of natural justice in a modern secular democracy?
How can a secular country spent tax payers money only for religious pilgrimage
of one particular community?? Haj houses have been built in every corner of the
country, subsidy on airfare is given, every send off & return is attended
by a political leader in every airport of the country. But not even a proper
road & shelter on the way in JK for Amarnath pilgrims as it will endanger
environment. Last year JK Govt. (coalition of NC & Congress) has even
withdrawn the little state support given on food & diesel etc. to Amarnath
pilgrimage on their way. But none of these “Secular Saints” raised a hue &
cry. Think of the same, had it been done for Haj. Dussehra, Hanuman Jayanti
& Ganesh Chaturthi processions can’t cross muslim majority areas, as
muslims will complain about breaking peace in their area by loud noise &
gatherings. But Hindus will have to hear the prayers from mosque 5 times a day
on loudspeakers (strangely even Indonesia, the country with the largest muslim
population doesn’t allow prayer on loudspeakers) because India is a secular
country. Riots will occur in Azad Maidan in Mumbai if illegal migrants get
killed due to their fight for encroachment on tribal land in Assam or bomb
blasts are justified in Bodhgaya as muslims are killed in Myanmar violence. But
if a hindu is killed or converted live on TV in Pakistan/Bangladesh, no hindu
should even utter a word , since hindus are secular & this is Pakistan's
internal matter. Crores of Bangladeshi muslims are allowed to settle in all
states of India, but India Govt. has no time to think of Kashmiri Pandits, who
have been systematically thrown out of their ancestral land of thousands of years.
Congress joins hand with Muslim league, MQM, AIUDF etc. to win election after
election, gave article 370, massacred thousands of Sikhs in Delhi in 1984,
nurtured Masood Madani of Kerela, Owaisi brothers of AP, Abu Azmi in Mumbai,
Geelanis in JK, but still Congress is most Secular & as BJP talks about
removal of article 370, uniform civil code for all citizens etc., so BJP is
most Communal. RJD
supremo, Laloo Yadav's only claim to fame apart from the fodder scam and the
lawlessness he gifted to Bihar, remains that of a die-hard secularist who got
LK Advani arrested. Nitish Kumar, rediscovers his secular credentials by
separating from BJP only after getting a shockingly lukewarm response to his
state-wide Sewa Yatra and sensing that his bete noire Laloo Yadav had recovered
some of his lost ground. Union Home Minister Shinde has given another
example of secular governance by issuing a dictate to the police of the country
not to arrest “muslim people” unnecessarily for investigating terror cases.
Mulayam Singh Yadav has instructed UP Police Chiefs to deploy atleast 3 muslim
policeman in every police station in UP. And too top it all the supreme leader
of Congress party, Sonia Gandhi refers to muslim voters as the only secular
voters of the country and ask for support service of Shahi Imam to get muslim
votes in block for Congress. A leader like Narendra Modi, who
says for him “Secularism means India First”, who says “Justice for all &
appeasement of none”, who says “Religion should not be used as an instrument in
our democratic process” is a “Communal” Politician but Digvijaya Singhs, Manish
Tiwaris, Mulayams - who use every available opportunity to appease muslims even
at the cost of national security like, Samjhauta Express Blast, 26/11 Mumbai
blast, Batala House encounter, Afzal Guru case, Ishrat Jahan case & even
demoralizes our armed forces & intelligence agencies are “Secular Saints”.
Does the “Secular Saints”
know the meaning of secularism? It is separation of religion from state.
A secular person or politician can continue to hold his personal
religious faith & beliefs, but he doesn't involve religion in matters of
governance. They need to remember that
India is a secular country, only because it’s 80% population is hindu. Nobody
also should try to hide that fact that as long as muslims are in minority in a
country, they want secularism to prevail but the moment they become majority,
they want a theocratic, shariah practicing Islamic country. Can they show a
muslim majority country, which is secular? India had Muslim as President, PM,
Chief justice and in many other important posts, only because it’a hindu majority country. Can they show a
muslim majority country where a non muslim could ever become a president, a
prime minister or a chief justice or even reach one of the highest ranks in
armed forces? Why a country, can a non muslim ever become CM in the only muslim
majority state in India i.e. Jammu & Kashmir? But the “Secular Saints” will
never raise those questions but ask only hindus of this country to practice secularism.
Hindu is the only religion who preaches and practices secularism in the true
sense and no hindu can be communal unless pushed to the wall as communalism is
not in the DNA of Hindus. History proves this fact and therefore, being the
largest religion at one time (few centuries ago), it’s survival is at stake
today for practicing secularism. The Mullah’s who preach hatred towards other
religious faith and belief every Friday and openly encourage people for “Jihad”
(hoy war) against “Kefers”(non believers) are all secular, the missioneries
who’s only aim in the guise of spreading education & health is religious
conversion are all seculars, but if some hindus try to protest or stop them in
such activity, they are communal. For these “Secular Saints”- deriding hindu
culture, faith and Gods through literature, art etc. are secular freedom of
expression but if someone presents facts against muslims, then that’s communal.
Sorry “Secular Saints”, your dangerous
& notorious game plan has been exposed & will not work with the
electorate this time. My vote will not be for a leader or a party who wears
religion on the head.
No comments:
Post a Comment